CA7: Two 911 calls about a road rage incident led to PC to search defendant’s car

A road rage incident was called into 911 twice by a woman involved who said the other driver was a man blocking her path, beating on her car window and shouting obscenities, and displaying a gun. When police arrived, they found the cars and a man fitting the description of the man with the gun. He had a bulge in his clothing which resulted in a patdown, but it was only a cell phone holder [make note of that for the future!]. The car door was left open, and the officer searched the car finding the gun. It turned out that the man was a felon in possession. “The suppression motion was properly denied. The officer had probable cause to search Charles’s car for a gun based on the 911 caller’s report and his own observations at the scene. As such, the search was permissible under the auto-mobile exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement.” United States v. Charles, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 16352 (7th Cir. September 14, 2015).

The stories from separate CIs combined here are to be added up to probable cause under the totality standard. United States v. Malek, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121948 (D.S.D. August 21, 2015).

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Informant hearsay, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.