OH1: A car listed on the search warrant could be searched away from the premises

“[*P7] Following the issuance of the warrant, RENU agents conducted surveillance on the residence at 3021 Cavanaugh Avenue. According to Deputy Kane, RENU agents would generally wait to execute a search warrant until an occupant left the targeted residence, especially where a vehicle was named as an object of the warrant, so that agents could get a key to the residence. Using this procedure, RENU agents could avoid being mistaken for intruders and harmed by other occupants or dogs, and the agents could avoid destroying the door to the residence.” [How civilized compared to Arkansas where it’s search at night, create a serious risk of danger, and shoot first, if necessary.] In addition, the search warrant authorized search of vehicles registered to the defendant, but the car was driven off. Under the terms of the search warrant, the car could be searched away from the residence when it was driven off. State v. Griffin, 2015-Ohio-3566, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3478 (1st Dist. September 2, 2015).

Defendant was an overnight guest, and he had standing to challenge the voluntariness of third-party consent. The trial court erred in finding no standing and not getting to consent, and the case is remanded for a finding on consent. State v. Beard, 2015-Ohio-3595, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 3494 (10th Dist. September 3, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Scope of search, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.