N.D.Ga.: Warrant for whole single family dwelling was not overbroad in a CP case

Search warrants are directed at places, and it doesn’t matter that several people live there. This was a single family dwelling, so the warrant wasn’t overbroad for identifying the whole home as a place to search in a child pornography case. United States v. Graham, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88796 (N.D. Ga. May 28, 2014).

Even if the defense lawyer had provided the impound policy, the search result wouldn’t be different. United States v. Foskey, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 12232 (11th Cir. June 30, 2014).*

The officers collectively had sufficient knowledge of probable cause to search defendant’s car. United States v. Jenkins, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88728 (S.D. Ill. June 30, 2014).*

Trial court’s finding of no consent from being confronted at night and having a flashlight shined in defendant’s eyes was not shown to be clearly erroneous, so it’s affirmed. State v. Purvis, 2014-Ohio-2865, 2014 Ohio App. LEXIS 2811 (9th Dist. June 30, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Inventory, Overbreadth, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.