CA7: Frisk without RS defendant was armed should have been suppressed

Police got an anonymous 911 call that a group of 25 men were standing around brandishing firearms. When they got there, it was a much smaller group and there were no firearms visible. For some reason, defendant was singled out for a frisk, and he resisted. The frisk was without reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing. Defendant was ostensibly doing nothing wrong. The anonymous call about a gun has a lower bar to cross, but here there was nothing as to defendant. United State v. Williams, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 19557 (7th Cir. September 24, 2013).*

“Here, the officers executing the search had been informed by a co-tenant that the apartment was being used as a drug mill, and the officers knew Almonte was aware that a search was imminent. Accordingly, the District Court’s conclusion that an exigency existed, based on the officers’ belief that evidence was being destroyed, was not clearly erroneous.” United States v. Almonte, 537 Fed. Appx. 64 (3d Cir. 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.