TN: LoJack alert defendant was using stolen computer confirmed by knock and talk justified SW

LoJack software put a stolen computer in defendant’s hands logging into her accounts. The police went to her house and got an admission that a computer was there. That was sufficient probable cause for a search warrant for the computer in the house, despite her argument that the computer could have logged in anywhere in the world. State v. Galemore, 2013 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 732 (August 29, 2013).*

Defendant was convicted of murder. His consent to search claim was not fleshed out and was cursory and treated as waived. (The conviction was reversed on other grounds.) State v. Bowman, 2013 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 735 (August 29, 2013).*

Defendant’s stop was based on two things: the fact an email from the National Precursor Law Enforcement Exchange Program (“PLEX”) that he purchased pseudoephedrine and the fact the LPN didn’t match the vehicle. The latter was enough here. State v. Pollard, 2013 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 72 (August 30, 2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.