Reasonable expectation of privacy when having sex in a closed shed outside Home Depot?

HuffPo: Emily Craig, Shaun Bowden Allegedly Have Sex At Home Depot by Hilary Hanson, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/08/29/emily-craig-shaun-bowden-home-depot-sex-_n_3837573.html (imbedded URL doesn’t work):

What’s the world coming to when you can’t go to Home Depot for a screw?

Emily Craig, 20, and Shaun Bowden, 31, were arrested Wednesday after allegedly having sex inside a display shed at a Home Depot store in North Charleston, S.C. according to a police report obtained by The Smoking Gun.

Someone called the cops at about 8:38 a.m., stating they saw the couple walk into the outdoor shed, shut the door and stay there.

Cops entered the shed and found Craig “partially clothed” and Bowden shirtless with “his pants down near his knees” and “penis … exposed,” according to the report.

Reasonable expectation of privacy or not? And what business was it of the cops that they went in there and shut the door? They created a subjective expectation. Was it objectively reasonable? What about Jones and a violation of the constitutionally protected area? You don’t have to own the “area” to have a right of privacy in it, just like Mr. Katz didn’t in the glass telephone booth.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.