D.Kan.: Commercial truck on private trip still subject to inspection

Defendant’s tractor trailer was subject to commercial vehicle inspection even though he claimed he was on a personal private trip and should be considered unregulated. United States v. Arlett, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 119768 (D. Kan. August 23, 2013):

This motion concerns a vehicle that Defendant maintains was not within the regulatory framework, because he maintains the vehicle was a noncommercial vehicle that he used for private, not commercial, trips. The Court rejects this argument for two reasons. First, Defendant relies on Kansas Administrative Regulation 82-4-3, titled “Exemption from the motor carrier safety regulations,” which states that, “[t]he [Kansas] safety regulations and the federal safety regulations adopted by reference in this article shall not apply to … [t]he occasional transportation of personal property by private motor carriers that is not for compensation and is not in the furtherance of a commercial enterprise,” and the federal regulations, which contain an identical exemption. But Defendant was transporting personal property in furtherance of a commercial enterprise; by his own testimony, he was retrieving conduit from New Mexico for use on his later cable installation contracts. Transportation of these supplies was, therefore, in furtherance of a commercial enterprise, and thus Defendant did not qualify for this exemption.

Second, even if Defendant did qualify for the exemption, under the Kansas commercial motor vehicle statutes and regulations, the private motor carrier safety exemption does not exempt a vehicle from random stops for commercial motor vehicle code enforcement. ….

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.