N.D.Ill.: ADD here didn’t make consent involuntary

The defendant was indicted for attempting to ship a military grade gyroscope overseas without an export license. When government agents met up with him to discuss the sale, and then revealed themselves as LEOs he ultimately consented to a search of his house. His claimed ADD did not show the consent was invalid. Credibility call goes to the government. United States v. Modir Trading, 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100304 (N.D. Ill. July 18, 2013):

Mohammadi contends, however, that he was under pressure and could not understand what he was consenting to because his mind draws a blank in such pressure situations. But neither his own testimony, in which he provided great detail regarding the events of April 21, nor the fact that he suffers from ADD supports the conclusion that he did not understand that he was consenting to a search of his home or that his consent was not voluntary. Being diagnosed with or treated for ADD alone is not dispositive of voluntariness.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.