CA2: Being asked for consent after lawyering up was not a Fourth Amendment violation

Plaintiff’s being asked for consent after he lawyered up was not a Fourth Amendment violation. Flynn v. James, 513 Fed. Appx. 37 (1st Cir. 2013).*

Officers had an objective basis for defendant’s probation search under California law, and his subjective intent claim fails. Defense counsel was thus not ineffective for not challenging the search. Quevedo v. Kramer, 510 Fed. Appx. 616 (9th Cir. 2013).*

Defendant pulled up and approached officers nearby a house where a DV call had been made. Alcohol on his breath justified detention. Durrance v. State, 319 Ga. App. 866, 738 S.E.2d 692 (2013).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.