CA2: Taking 3 day old son from mother affected father’s 4A & 14A rights too

Plaintiff stated a claim for relief under the due process clause and Fourth Amendment for the City taking his 3 day old son from his mother based on actions of her other boyfriends without any court order. He was three years getting reunited. K.W. v. City of N.Y., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 14249 (2d Cir. May 19, 2026).*

Defendant’s computer wasn’t able to be searched within the 120 window, so the government got an extension, which was valid. United States v. Tanjapatkul, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109830 (C.D. Cal. May 8, 2026).*

Defendant’s multiple Franks issues are rejected and don’t require a hearing. One was that another’s custodial statement was uncounseled, and another was that he was identified by a single photograph show up. But he already knew defendant. United States v. Drew, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109074 (W.D. Mo. May 18, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Computer and cloud searches, Due process, Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.