D.D.C.: Warrantless computer search ordered stopped

An attorney whose computer was seized and copied gets a TRO against further searches on a prima facie showing of its warrantless search. Richman v. United States, Civil Misc. Action No. 25-0170 (CKK) (D.D.C. Dec. 6, 2025):

The Court concludes that Petitioner Richman is likely to succeed on the merits of his claim that the Government has violated his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches and seizures by retaining a complete copy of all files on his personal computer (an “image” of the computer) and searching that image without a warrant. See United States v. Comey, No. 1:25-CR-272-MSN-WEF, 2025 WL 3202693, at *4–7 (E.D. Va. Nov. 17, 2025). The Court further concludes that Petitioner Richman is also likely to succeed in showing that, because of those violations, he is entitled to the return of the image under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(g).

Petitioner Richman has also shown that, absent an injunction, he will be irreparably harmed by the ongoing violation of his Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable seizures arising from the Government’s continuing retention of the image of his computer and related materials. Finally, the Court finds that the balance of the equities and the public interest weigh in Petitioner Richman’s favor and support a limited temporary restraining order that is narrowly tailored to preserving the status quo while this Court considers his Motion for Return of Property on an expedited basis.

Updates: ATL: DOJ Locked Out Of Comey Evidence It Never Should Have Had by Andrew Torrez and Liz Dye; WaPo: Judge blocks access to emails seized from James Comey’s lawyer

This entry was posted in Computer and cloud searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.