CA5: Inmate stated claim for body cavity search in view of female guards

Pro se prison inmate’s § 1983 case “alleged that he was subjected to strip and visual body cavity searches in the presence of female prison employees in violation of the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments.” He stated no claim under the Eighth Amendment but he did under the Fourth: “Accepting Waddleton’s allegations as true, which we must, … there was no justification, penological or otherwise, for the searches conducted in this case.” Waddleton v. Jackson, 445 Fed. Appx. 808 (5th Cir. 2011).

An officer who saw an apparently hand-to-hand transaction between a group of three men and an SUV that pulled up and left had reasonable suspicion to stop them on the street. State v. Keller, 77 So. 3d 378 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2011).*

Running from the police with gun in hand is reasonable suspicion. State v. Cummings, 79 So. 3d 386 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2011).*

The affidavit for the search warrant showed probable cause based on information from the CI which was significantly corroborated and defendant’s criminal history and outstanding warrants. State v. Voltolina, 77 So. 3d 1027 (La. App. 5th Cir. 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.