KY: Stop based on a statute not yet in effect isn’t a reasonable mistake of law

Defendant’s stop based on a vehicle equipment law that had not yet gone into effect was not saved by Heien. As in: when the law’s not yet law, there can’t be a reasonable mistake about its application. “An officer cannot stop a motorist based on speculation about what the law requires. There can be no good faith under such circumstances.” As to informant hearsay, the sole fact an informant was known from a prior DV call isn’t reason to credit her story without more to show this story was reliably true. Vincent v. Commonwealth, 2024 Ky. LEXIS 402 (Dec. 19, 2024).

“The following non-exhaustive factors may contribute to reasonable suspicion for extending a traffic stop: (1) a high-crime area; (2) a short-term stop at a hotel; (3) the time of day; (4) failure to promptly pull over; (5) driving a vehicle registered to an absent third party; (6) driving without a valid driver’s license or insurance; (7) prior criminal history; and (8) lies, evasion, or inconsistencies. ‘Each factor is not to be considered in isolation because even though one factor alone may be innocently explained, the factors considered together can support reasonable suspicion.’ The Court will examine these seemingly innocuous factors and determine whether, in the aggregate, they can amount to a reasonable, articulable suspicion that Defendant was engaged in criminal activity.” Here they do. United States v. Presley, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230671 (D. Kan. Dec. 20, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.