CO: During a sweep of a vehicle after a furtive movement, the officer was not obliged to ignore a pipe he came upon by plain feel

The car was stopped for a taillight violation, and the defendant passenger made a furtive movement down. The officer did a protective sweep of the area and found a glove which he picked up. While it did not contain a weapon, it contained a pipe, and the office was not required to ignore it. Suppression order reversed. People v. Brant, 252 P.3d 459 (Colo. 2011).*

Defendant’s car was stopped with the hood up, and an officer, suspecting him of possession of drugs, approached him to ask if he had car trouble. In a non-threatening manner, the officer asked to conduct a patdown and a search of the car, which defendant agreed to. People v. Walters, 249 P.3d 805 (Colo. 2011).*

Defendant on arrest was Mirandized and lawyered up. He was put in a police car and taken to the police station. While riding, he started talking without prompting, and then he was asked for consent to a search of his car which he granted. The search was valid. State v. Ashby, 339 S.W.3d 600 (Mo. App. 2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.