KS: Finding arrest warrant on passenger after stop with RS was not subject to exclusion

Where a stop was with reasonable suspicion, and that included the passenger, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment to run the passenger’s ID through the system. An arrest warrant would not be suppressed. State v. Walker, 251 P.3d 618 (Kan. 2011), affg State v. Walker, 41 Kan. App. 2d 337, 202 P.3d 685 (2009).

Defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion, and seeing a black gun on the floorboard (a toy gun) was in plain view. Commonwealth v. Brown, 2011 PA Super 67, 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 135 (April 4, 2011),* on reargument from Commonwealth v. Brown, 2010 PA Super 27, 2010 Pa. Super. LEXIS 53 (2010) (and reaching same result).

Police came on an assist to retrieve children from a house by a father who said that his wife claimed to talk to the dead. He feared the children were not being fed. When they knocked at the door, the defendant only acknowledged that she was inside but further refused to communicate. The defendant’s actions rose to the level of concern for the welfare of the children under the community caretaking function. People v. Hand, 408 Ill. App. 3d 695, 349 Ill. Dec. 343, 946 N.E.2d 537 (2011).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.