KS: Where there is PC for a search, the officer can ask for the key to a locked toolbox

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense, and the officer could smell marijuana coming from the car. This was probable cause. In the back seat was a locked toolbox. Under the probable cause, the officer could ask for the key to the box without violating Miranda. State v. Goff, 44 Kan. App. 2d 536, 239 P.3d 467 (2010).*

Defendant’s arrest was illegal, but he made statements to other inmates 20 hours after arrest in Central Booking which were admissions. The fruit was unpoisoned by the time and space between the illegal arrest and the statements. Cox v. State, 194 Md. App. 629, 5 A.3d 730 (2010).*

Defendant was arrested as an internet traveler meeting up with a fictitious child for sex. His car was across the street from where he was arrested. The search of the car was valid because he was “in the vicinity” [obviously conflating search incident completely contrary to Gant and the automobile exception in the opinion where there’s no suggestion of PC of evidence in the car; you try to figure it out; I can’t; Gant was over a year ago, come on!]. In any event, he was arrested and the car was towed, so inevitable discovery applied to the inventory [which isn’t even discussed as to whether it was within policy; this court is notorious for making up arguments the state didn’t to help the state and then not adequately explaining them]. Fuson v. State, 2010 Ark. App. 593, 2010 Ark. App. LEXIS 632 (September 15, 2010),* rehearing denied by 2010 Ark. App. LEXIS 743 (Oct. 27, 2010), review granted by 2010 Ark. LEXIS 548 (Nov. 11, 2010).

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.