GA: Arrest for loitering in a parking lot did not justify search of nearby car

Defendant and a companion were seen in a parking lot peering into cars and checking door handles. The officer stopped and talked to them about what they were doing and arrested them for loitering. The officer located their car and searched it. They were nowhere near the car so a search of the car was invalid. Holsey v. State, 306 Ga. App. 75, 701 S.E.2d 538 (2010).*

Defendant was stopped for a traffic offense and $4,280 was found in his pocket and a small quantity of cocaine in the console. The state failed in its burden of proving that the money was from the sale of drugs; the defendant did not have to prove anything. Williams v. State, 46 So. 3d 3 (Ala. Civ. App. 2010).

None of defendant’s 2255 hypertechnical Fourth Amendment IAC claims would have changed the outcome. The case was effectively argued in the first instance, and none of defendant’s new post-conviction arguments can carry the day. United States v. Rice, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 94511 (N.D. Ohio February 4, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.