LA4: No reasonable expectation of privacy in Katrina damaged abandoned home

Defendant was allegedly drug dealing out of a Hurricane Katrina damaged and abandoned building with no windows or doors, and a neighbor complained to the police. He had no expectation of privacy against a police entry. State v. Patterson, 38 So. 3d 1131 (La. App. 4th Cir. 2010);* State v. Carter, 38 So. 3d 1092 (La. App. 4th Cir. 2010).*

Since defendant’s unpursued motion to suppress was meritless, defense counsel cannot be ineffective assistance of counsel. Burgess v. United States, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48464 (S.D. Ohio April 22, 2010).*

Defendant made a sufficient showing of a Randolph veto of consent issue to get a hearing. United States v. Penlton, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48175 (W.D. Wis. April 16, 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.