E.D.Va.: Attempt to intervene in another action barred by Heck

Plaintiff-intervener convict could not intervene in a civil action filed by his stepfather challenging subpoenas for records. His claim is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, aside from being untimely. Booker v. Dominion Va. Power, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29076 (E.D. Va. March 26, 2010).*

Encounter with defendant in his yard was not a “stop” for Terry purposes, no matter what the officer called it in his own reports. There was no show of force or aggression. The officers did not block the driveway, and their lights were not on. United States v. Sullivan, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28966 (W.D. Ky. March 24, 2010).*

Search incident of a car for a driver’s license infraction was unjustified under Gant. The state’s effort to distinguish Gant as involving one suspect and here two is rejected (Belton was 4-1). There was no reason to believe they posed a threat to the officer, as he admitted on the stand. State v. Grubb, 2010 Ohio 1265, 186 Ohio App. 3d 744, 930 N.E.2d 380 (3d Dist. 2010).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.