S.D.Cal.: Federal regs requiring investigation of death on cruise ships does not make cruise line federal agent

Defendant was detained and his room aboard the Carnival cruise ship Elation was searched by the crew in investigating the death of his wife at sea. The federal regulations requiring reports of deaths at sea and the cruise line’s pre-existing “agreement” with the FBI to so did not make the search of his belongings a government search. The federal requirement is “investigate,” not “search.” The court distinguishes airline security cases because they are required to search. United States v. McGill, 718 F. Supp. 2d 1240 (S.D. Cal. 2010).

Defendant’s consent to search his vehicle was consensual to the FBI. In the course of the discussions leading up to the consent, he admitting to being a snitch (“worked with” a sheriff’s deputy) and offered to be one for the FBI. After that he consented. United States v. Freeman, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24642 (S.D. Fla. March 16, 2010).*

There was probable cause for issuance of the search warrant in this case, and the good faith exception saved it in any event. United States v. Henson, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24927 (D. Md. March 16, 2010)* (without discussion).

The affidavit for the search warrant for a doctor’s office in an investigation of prescribing drugs without seeing patients showed probable cause. Even if it didn’t, the good faith exception applied. United States v. McKinney, 695 F. Supp. 2d 182 (E.D. Pa. 2010) [Even doctors need lawyers; this one alleged that his statements to the DEA during the officer search were uncounseled.]

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.