E.D.Mich.: Def’s stop and frisk on a residential street in Detroit was completely without legal justification and suppressed

Police pulled up on the defendant and made him lift his shirt, completely without legal justification. It is suppressed. United States v. Watson, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134627 (E.D. Mich. Aug. 9, 2019)*:

In the instant case there was not even a traffic stop. Defendant was standing beside his car when the police drove up, exited their car, approached Defendant and his friend, asked the Defendant if he had ID, lifted up his untucked shirt and seized a pistol from his waistband.

While the officers testified that they saw a bulge on the left side of Defendant’s untucked shirt, they asked only if he had ID. They did not ask if he had a gun or a CPL, which would have corroborated their testimony that they assumed he was carrying a pistol beneath his shirt. Further, the officers did not even do a frisk before the search. The officers had not received any information from dispatch that there was a suspicion of criminal activity or a gun in the neighborhood that afternoon. While both officers testified, neither testified that they knew Defendant, and that he had a criminal record.

There was no evidence that what occurred here was a consensual encounter or a consensual search before the officer’s search and seizure occurred.

This entry was posted in Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.