CA6: Eyewitness identification alone can be RS

“So did the officer have reasonable suspicion to stop Lett? Yes. The eyewitness identifications, alone, created that suspicion.” United States v. Lett, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 22987 (6th Cir. Aug. 1, 2019).*

Defendant’s traffic stop for moving within his own lane lacked a factual basis, and everything is suppressed. State v. Raubenolt, 2019-Ohio-3112, 2019 Ohio App. LEXIS 3191 (5th Dist. Aug. 1, 2019).*

An anonymous call about trespassing in a car matching the description of defendant’s eight blocks away was without reasonable suspicion. There was no corroboration. Facio v. N.D. DOT, 2019 ND 199, 2019 N.D. LEXIS 204 (July 30, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.