IA: State const. search and seizure provision to be interpreted as the 4A; that’s what the state framers wanted

The state constitution does not require a different outcome for pretextual stops than under the Fourth Amendment. It isn’t prudential to do so, and the state’s 1857 constitutional convention wanted the state to follow the Fourth Amendment. State v. Brown, 2019 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 83 (June 28, 2019).

Defendant argues that the finding of his drugs was the result of his illegal arrest. It was from his abandoning it when he was brought to the jail. State v. McMillon, 2019-Ohio-2716 (7th Dist. July 2, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Abandonment, State constitution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.