“Rule 41(g) is not an appropriate vehicle for the return of property seized by civil forfeiture.” United States v. Bynum, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 17510 (11th Cir. June 12, 2019).
Defendant’s claim there was a reasonable expectation of privacy as to his statements and photographs taken in the ICU doesn’t need to be decided because it would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. People v. Caro, 2019 Cal. LEXIS 4012 (June 13, 2019).*
Defendant’s reaching for his waistband was the officer’s reasonable suspicion he was armed. United States v. Elmore, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98350 (D. Mass. June 11, 2019).*