FL: Defendant in capital case admittedly abandoned campsite searched by police

Defendant by his own admission abandoned property at his campsite in Tennessee in flight from a murder, and the hosts called the police because the valuable things appeared to them to have been stolen. [No conflict of laws issue, and result would be the same in a Tennessee court; decided on Fourth Amendment.] Twilegar v. State, 42 So. 3d 177, 35 Fla. L. Weekly S 13 (2010).*

In response to a shooting call, defendant and his victim were found lying in a pool of blood. The entry and view were reasonable. State v. Plauche, 32 So. 3d 852 (La. App. 3d Cir. 2010).*

Officers saw an occupant of a car urinate in public and get back in the car and throw a can out of it. They approached and saw marijuana in plain view. On questioning, defendant admitted he had a gun. The stop was valid. People v Wright, 2010 NY Slip Op 19, 2010 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19 (3d Dept. January 7, 2010).*

“We agree with the District Court that the parole agents clearly possessed reasonable suspicion to conduct the searches, and we therefore need not decide whether the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Samson, 547 U.S. 843 (2006), otherwise permits suspicion-less searches in the current circumstances.” United States v. Henry, 360 Fed. Appx. 395 (3d Cir. 2010) (unpublished).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.