A child pornography search warrant for all computer stuff in the house associated with a particular IP address wasn’t directed at defendant–it was for the IP address to identify the potential user. Seizing all computer related stuff in the house wasn’t unreasonable under the warrant. O’Connor v. State, 2019 Alas. App. LEXIS 58 (Apr. 12, 2019).
“Ricks’s claim that Stearns’s affidavit establishes that the government committed fraud on the court when it used the affidavit to improperly obtain a wiretap on his cellular phone does not satisfy the requirements for authorizing him to file a second or successive § 2255 motion.” It’s not newly discovered. Ricks v. United States, 2019 U.S. App. LEXIS 10746 (6th Cir. Apr. 11, 2019).*