ID: Entry on a writ of execution was reasonable under 4A

A state officer acting on a writ of execution issued by a state court was reasonable. Moreover, plaintiff’s claim is really just a suggestion in a pleading, not in the complaint. Thornton v. Barrett, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53388 (D. Ida. Mar. 29, 2019).*

A report that a car was stolen was a reasonable basis for stopping it. United States v. Dudley, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52924 (D. Colo. Mar. 28, 2019).*

“On appeal, the Fourth Circuit rejected Movant’s claim that the evidence should have been suppressed because of a defective search warrant, holding that, even if the warrant was constitutionally defective, ‘the district court did not err by finding the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule to be applicable.’ … Therefore, Movant is procedurally barred from repeating the argument on collateral review.” Hersman v. United States, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53783 (S.D. W.Va. Mar. 29, 2019).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.