S.D.N.Y.: Franks challenge that SW general allegation about sex traffickers doesn’t apply to def isn’t false at this stage

Defendant is alleged to be involved in a sex trafficking operation that spanned nearly 20 years. His Franks motion is denied. One of the things he mentions was that he wasn’t involved with the Bloods in a long time, but the indictment mentions him and the Bloods and says the conspiracy ranged from 1998 to date. That’s not inconsistent or misleading. Also, he argues that how sex trafficking in general operates as a reason to get to search cell phones doesn’t apply to him. That’s beside the point on probable cause and why officers needed to search them in the first place. United States v. Pierre-Louis, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134899 (S.D. N.Y. Aug. 10, 2018).*

About a 4 am meet between a car and a bicycle at a convenience store in a high crime area known for drug deals on the parking lot: “Applying these standards, the Court has no difficulty concluding that under the totality of circumstances in this case, Defendant’s detention was supported by an objectively reasonable, articulable suspicion that Defendant was involved in criminal drug activity. … [¶] The Ninth Circuit has found the existence of reasonable suspicion in other cases involving similar facts.” United States v. Hanks, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134820 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 9, 2018).*

This entry was posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.