D.Nev.: Information for probation search was woefully insufficient and some even stale

Probation officers lacked reasonable suspicion for a search of defendant’s residence, and none of the five proffered reasons was sufficient. Strongest might have been that defendant was alleged to have used anabolic steroids, but there was no probation condition against their use and the hearsay information about it was tenuous at best and completely uncorroborated and stale. United States v. Manansingh, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141189 (D. Nev. Aug. 31, 2017).

An arrest warrant grants officers “limited authority” to enter to arrest, and a plain view and a protective sweep may reasonably result. United States v. Hamilton, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 142997 (N.D. Ga. Jan. 3, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.