PA: Telling def to “come here” when officer perceived apparent curfew violation was not a substantial interference with liberty

Saying to defendant “come here” when the officer saw defendant on the street and suspected a violation of the curfew law was not a substantial interference with defendant’s liberty to be a seizure. Commonwealth v. Newsome, 2017 PA Super 290, 2017 Pa. Super. LEXIS 680 (Sept. 7, 2017).

Defendant was lawfully in custody at the police station after his arrest with his vehicle when he was seen putting a baggie of drugs in his mouth, which was lawfully seized. Thomas v. State, 2017 Ind. LEXIS 659 (Sept. 7, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.