OH9: Potential working meth lab was exigency for entry

Officer’s seeing meth through window and then bottles used for making meth suggested making methamphetamine which is recognized as an exigency. State v. Secriskey, 2017-Ohio-4169, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2217 (9th Dist. June 7, 2017).

Defendant gets limited discovery of a prior impoundment by the officer that violated policy. United States v. Flores, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85978 (C.D. Cal. June 2, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.