WV: Defendant’s recorded consent shows it was valid

Defendant’s recorded consent shows it was valid. “he does not contest the voluntariness of the search and appears to take issue only with the extent of his voluntary consent. Petitioner’s consent to the search was recorded by law enforcement, and it reveals that petitioner specifically stated ‘it don’t [sic] matter where you check at in the house, you know ….’” State v. Juan M., 2017 W. Va. LEXIS 352 (May 19, 2017) (memorandum).

The smell of burning marijuana coming from defendant’s car was probable cause to search the car. State v. Richmond, 2017-Ohio-2860, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 1888 (8th Cir. May 18, 2017).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.