OH8: State admin subpoena might be burdensome and time consuming but it’s not unreasonable

“While GMS might find some of the Commission’s investigative techniques time consuming and burdensome, GMS is unable to show that the Commission’s investigations violated the Fourth Amendment or otherwise fell outside the scope of what is permitted under statute.” GMS Mgmt. Co. v. Ohio Civ. Rights Comm’n, 2016-Ohio-7486, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 4435 (8th Dist. Oct. 27, 2016).

Defendant was convicted of his third DWI in five years. He alleged a prior was invalid under the Fourth Amendment. “Additionally, Swaim argues a Fourth Amendment right violation occurred because his DUI stemmed from an illegal search and seizure. Swaim, however, does not state from which DUI this allegation arises or what illegal search occurred. Without more, this Court cannot address this contention.” Swaim v. State, 2016 Miss. App. LEXIS 700 (Nov. 1, 2016).*