E.D.Pa.: Probable cause did not become stale as defendant drove from Philadelphia to Erie with drugs

Probable cause did not become stale as defendant drove from Philadelphia to Erie with drugs. United States v. Andino, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117097 (E.D.Pa. Aug. 31, 2016).

“The fifteen minute period between Defendant’s initial stop and the contested canine search was not unreasonably long given Officer Graham’s early formation of reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.” United States v. Bastardo-Villanueva, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115480 (M.D.La. Aug. 29, 2016).*

Defendant consented to extending the stop until reasonable suspicion developed. United States v. Ramos, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 114230 (D.N.M. July 11, 2016).*

Defendant’s speeding stop led to finding he had a suspended DL and that led to a valid inventory of his car when he was arrested. United States v. Conaway, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 115779 (S.D.Ga. Aug. 29, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.