Seizure of vehicle for forfeiture validly led to inventory

Defendant’s vehicle was contraband for forfeiture at the time of his arrest because of a prior drug sale from the car. Therefore, the police could inventory it on seizure for forfeiture under Florida v. White. United States v. Shipe, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59614 (E.D. Tenn. May 23, 2008).*

Government did not exceed defendant’s wife’s private search of his child porn under Jacobsen when they got his computer and DVDs and got a warrant and searched them later. “[O]n the facts of this case, the subsequent search did not enable the Government to “learn[] something … that it could not have learned from the private searcher’s testimony.” Runyan, 275 F.3d at 461. Accordingly, the Court finds that the Government’s search of the imaged hard drives of the Netcap computers did not exceed the scope of the private search and, thus, did not violate the Fourth Amendment.” United States v. Guindi, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59580 (N.D. Cal. March 25, 2008).*

Probable cause for a vehicle stop and search was present when the police were surveilling a house that was near the location of a wiretapped cellphone. When they reasonably believed that the cocaine supplier would have likely been using that vehicle, there was probable cause. United States v. Jackson, 548 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (M.D. Fla. 2008).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.