CA5: Knock-and-talk on a fence’s warehouse was reasonable and led to consent and plain view

Officers did a knock-and-talk on a warehouse suspected of being a location for a fence to keep his stolen goods pending resale. The entry was supported by consent and was reasonable. United States v. Danhach, 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 4421 (5th Cir. March 9, 2016).

The officer’s conclusions leading to probable cause are buttressed by an apparent hand-to-hand drug sale they saw. Defendant failed to make his Franks burden that something in the affidavit was recklessly included or material to the finding of probable cause. United States v. Davis, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29421 (E.D.N.C. March 8, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Knock and talk, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.