N.D.Ga.: Woman def spent last night with didn’t have apparent authority to consent to search room

Defendant stayed with his aunt. He spent the night with a woman in his bedroom. It wasn’t reasonable to conclude that the woman he spent the night with had common authority over the room to consent. United States v. Jackson, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23566 (N.D.Ga. Feb. 26, 2016).

Defendant was stopped with reasonable suspicion of credit card fraud, and his windows were overtinted. The passenger did not respond to get out of the car, so the officer opened the door because he couldn’t see her. The smell of marijuana came out, and marijuana was in plain view. Opening the door was reasonable under the circumstances. State v. Matthews, 2016 La. App. LEXIS 372 (La.App. 1 Cir. Feb. 26, 2016).*

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress the search of his car with a warrant for evidence of a murder. There was probable cause, and it would be futile. State v. Durham, 2016-Ohio-691, 2016 Ohio App. LEXIS 614 (8th Dist. Feb. 25, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Apparent authority, Ineffective assistance. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.