S.D.W.Va.: 30 minute delay of stop for drug dog unreasonable

The stop was admittedly justified for a traffic offense, but the officer intentionally delayed ten minutes the writing of the traffic ticket, apparently to give more time for the drug dog to arrive. The dog arrived over thirty minutes into the stop, and the stop was unconstitutionally prolonged. United States v. Martin, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13989 (S.D.W.Va. Feb. 5, 2016).

Defendant was a suspect in an attempted murder of a federal judge. USM’s went to his place with an arrest warrant, and he wouldn’t come out although it was reasonable to believe he was home, so they came in with a dog. The dog was deployed because of a risk of violence when defendant didn’t answer inside, and defendant was found hiding and was bitten by the dog. The entry and sweep were reasonable under the circumstances based on the arrest warrant under Buie. It was his known place, and they had reason to believe he was there [and he was]. After he was removed, his wife then signed a consent form to search the place. A computer and phone were found, and they were added to the form, and she initialed the change. The consents were voluntary. United States v. Richardson, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 175851 (M.D.Fla. Dec. 15, 2015),* adopted 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13778 (M.D. Fla. Feb. 4, 2016).*

This entry was posted in Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.