N.D.Ga.: SW for pain management clinic permitted search of office manager’s purse because some smaller objects of search might be there

The search here was for a pain management clinic, and defendant was the officer manager, and her purse was searched under the warrant. “At the time of the search, agents were aware that Rosso was the office manager of the Pain Center and it was entirely reasonable for the agents to believe that the purse located on an office desk could easily contain items authorized for seizure under the search warrant, including prescription pads, prescriptions, and currency, to name a few.” United States v. Rosso, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 154435 (N.D.Ga. Sept. 3, 2015), adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153609 (N.D.Ga. Nov. 12, 2015).

“The State bears the burden of proving facts that establish a basis for continued detention. … [W]hether the State has met this burden is a question of law ….” Here, there were no findings to support reasonable suspicion or not for extending the stop, so the case is vacated for findings. Reyes v. State, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 674 (Nov. 16, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Scope of search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.