NY Co. Ct.: Prison inmate pat frisk that includes touching genitals not unreasonable

A pat frisk of a prison inmate that often includes touching the genitals is not unreasonable because of the loss of liberty that comes with incarceration. There is no equal protection claim just because prison visitors don’t go through the same frisk. Matter of Morrow v. Annucci, 2015 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 4098, 2015 NY Slip Op 25381 (Cayuga Co. Nov. 5, 2015).

Defendant was arrested on a domestic relations warrant, and his wallet was searched and money with recorded serial numbers from drug offenses he was suspected of were found. That was in plain view. [Apparently search incident was too far for them.] United States v. Pace, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153766 (M.D.Pa. Nov. 13, 2015).*

Defendant’s search incident after a traffic stop led to his guilty plea in 2009. He lost a motion to suppress and pled guilty. Then Gant was decided. He can’t relitigate. “Here, Darcus, through counsel, litigated his Fourth Amendment claim through two motions to suppress, as part of the motion to withdraw his guilty plea, and on appeal to the Fourth Circuit. Darcus also identifies no intervening change of law that would allow him to relitigate this claim.” [Apparently Gant isn’t a change in the law to this court.] United States v. Darcus, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153361 (E.D.Va. Nov. 12, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.