OH12: Passenger’s nervous behavior more significant than driver’s

Defendant was not a listed driver on the rental agreement and he failed to keep eye contact with the officer during the stop. “Hill’s nervous behavior is more significant because as the passenger of the Impala, he did not commit the traffic violation.” State v. Hill, 2015-Ohio-4655, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 4542 (12th Dist. Nov. 9, 2015).

A citizen informant called the police about a suspicious person, and the police arrived and called out to defendant and others. Defendant asked “why? what did I do?” but he walked away and hid his right hand and was moving it around like there was something there he didn’t want the police to see. That was reasonable suspicion. State v. Baker, 2015-Ohio-4709, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 4585 (2d Dist. Nov. 13, 2015).*

A bar owner text messaged police on patrol that he had a patron with a gun in his waistband and described him. Officers secured the exits and one went for the man and a struggle ensued over the gun. The detailed information came from a citizen informant, and it was presumptively reliable. United States v. McCaw, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153806 (C.D.Ill. Oct. 20, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.