E.D.N.C.: Collective knowledge doctrine applies between FBI and state officers

“The collective knowledge doctrine, however, is not limited to cases where a superior officer commands another officer. Rather, the doctrine properly may be applied in cases where information is relayed between different law enforcement departments, even when the agency possessing probable cause does not presume the authority to formally ‘direct’ another, separate agency.” United States v. Ittenbach, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145008 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 26, 2015), R&R 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145005 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 3, 2015).

Surveillance of a barber shop for defendant coming out to do drug deals bore fruit, and the car he got into was stopped with reasonable suspicion. The statements made during the stop are not suppressed. United States v. Palmer, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 144987 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2015).*

Defendant voluntarily consented to a urine test for DUI after being advised of her right to counsel. Poeschel v. Comm’r of Pub. Safety, 2015 Minn. App. LEXIS 81 (Oct. 26, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Collective knowledge, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.