D.Minn.: Hypodermic needle felt in patdown could be seized as potential weapon

A patdown that felt a hypodermic needle was valid because a needle could be used as a weapon. United States v. Rush, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90250 (D.Minn. July 13, 2015).

Defendant was stopped for suspicion of DUI on federal lands. His implied consent wasn’t invalid just because the federal courts can’t impose some state driving restrictions. United States v. Slagle, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90269 (D.Md. July 13, 2015).*

And, 36 CFR § 4.23 on federal implied consent is not unconstitutional under McNeely. United States v. Jones, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90165 (D.Md. June 25, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.