D.Mont.: Mother couldn’t consent to adult son’s room; not reasonable for police to believe she had apparent authority

Mother could not consent to search of adult son’s room. “This court is less persuaded by the presumption of control given to parents in Rith when the child at issue has been an adult for over two decades.” “Based on these facts they knew at the time, ‘the agents could not reasonably have believed [Johnson] had authority to consent to this search.’ United States v. Whitfield, 939 F.2d 1071, 1074, 291 U.S. App. D.C. 243 (D.C. Cir. 1991).” United States v. Brown, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73277 (D.Mont. June 4, 2015). The codefendant friend, however, had no standing. United States v. Cislo, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 73275 (D.Mont. June 4, 2015).

Even though the Nevada wiretapping law hasn’t been updated since 1973, its definition of “wire communications” includes cell phone calls. Sharpe v. State, 2015 Nev. LEXIS 39 (June 4, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Apparent authority. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.