NJ: Protective sweep of car that nobody was getting back into was unreasonable

Defendant was in a car with three others stopped for traffic violations. None of the four owned the car, but the driver produced the registration and insurance card and admitted his license was suspended. All four were frisked and nothing was found. Two had warrants on them and were arrested. The other two had no driver’s license and weren’t going to get to drive off. For officer safety, the car was subjected to a protective sweep for weapons, and the court finds it excessive. State v. Robinson, 2015 N.J. Super. LEXIS 88 (May 21, 2015).

Defendant was snitched off by her boyfriend that she’d be carrying drugs on an Amtrak train, and officers went to her at the train station and asked about it. They ultimately developed reasonable suspicion. A search of her bag was by consent after she asked about the consequences of refusal, and that produced unmarked pill bottles which were seized, and she claimed she had a prescription. She was allowed to go on the train. The police later subpoenaed her prescription records and found no record of the drugs. State v. Dupree, 2015 MT 103, 378 Mont. 499, 346 P.3d 1114 (April 14, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.