OH8: Def’s frisk before being put in back of police car for no apparent reason was unreasonable

After the driver of a car was arrested, the passenger was transportation-less because the car was being towed. He was going to call for a ride. For no apparent reason, the officer put him in the patrol car and patted him down finding a gun. The search was illegal, and the trial court properly suppressed the search. There was no reason to put defendant in the patrol car to wait for a ride. State v. Holder, 2015-Ohio-1837, 2015 Ohio App. LEXIS 1813 (8th Dist. May 14, 2015).

Defendant’s stop was with reasonable suspicion. “Here, the surveillance team possessed more than enough information to justify the investigatory stop of Defendant and brief seizure of his vehicle on March 20, 2014. This was not an action taken upon cursory, anectodal observations of the Defendant. This action occurred as part of a two-day long surveillance operation during which the agents intercepted numerous calls suggesting narcotics activity, and just minutes after the agents saw Rudi, a subject of a court-ordered wiretap, hand the Defendant, or at least an occupant of Defendant’s car, a white bag in the parking lot and drive off.” United States v. Hernandez-Valencia, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64239 (N.D. Ga. March 23, 2015), adopted 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63114 (N.D. Ga. May 14, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.