Male officer’s patdown of woman’s groin overcame qualified immunity

Male officer’s patdown of a woman using his cupped hand to touch her groin area, if true, stated a claim and overcame qualified immunity. Cherney v. City of Burnsville, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1345 (D. Minn. January 8, 2008).*

Three hand-to-hand transactions on the street was probable cause to believe defendant was dealing drugs. United States v. McGeth, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1154 (E.D. Pa. January 7, 2008).*

The affidavit for the search warrant was so conclusory that it did not provide probable cause, but it was not so conclusory that it was not at least sustained by the good faith exception. United States v. Medina-Rodriguez, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95490 (D. Minn. December 4, 2007)* (Comment: The only problem is that the court states all this conclusorily, which is only fitting, I suppose.)

Defendant’s contact with three law enforcement officers was not coercive. “As long as the person being questioned is free to ignore the questions and walk away, the Constitution is not implicated. … In this instance, while there were three officers present, their presence cannot be characterized as threatening-they were in plain clothes and at no time displayed their weapons or used harsh, threatening or coercive language. There was no evidence of any physical contact. And there was no evidence that any of the officers indicated compliance with their requests might be compelled.” United States v. Luken, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95494 (D. S.D. April 20, 2007).*

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.