Ninth Circuit has computer border search case

The ABA’s website posted this less than three hours ago: 9th Circuit Considers Border Computer Search, referring to a NY Times article, If Your Hard Drive Could Testify … The Fourth Circuit has already held that they can be searched, but there Customs had cause. From ABAjournal.com:

A federal appeals court appears poised to rule that a computer has no special protection from searches at the border.

The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is expected to rule in the case of Michael T. Arnold, who is seeking to throw out evidence of child pornography found by a customs officer who clicked on folders called “Kodak pictures” and “Kodak memories,” Adam Liptak writes in his column for the New York Times.

The panel judges who heard the case in October appeared to favor arguments that computers deserve no special protection from border searches, the article says. U.S. District Judge Dean Pregerson ruled earlier that the evidence should be suppressed, and he is the only judge to take that position in a border computer-search case.

In 2005, the Richmond, Va.-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit in a similar case upheld the conviction of a man who crossed the Canadian border with child porn on his computer.

My prior post on the child porn case is here.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.