CA1: There was RS for the border search of defendant’s computer and cell phones

Defendant made his fifth short trip from Puerto Rico to Colombia in a few months, and he was flagged for secondary border screening. His older but operational laptop had no data on it. Questions about his trip made no real sense, and he lied about the source of money for his plane ticket. The border search of his computer and cell phones was reasonable. Drugs were hidden in the computer. United States v. Molina-Gómez, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4611 (1st Cir. March 20, 2015).

Defendant accosted a UPS driver to take a box without a label to ship it immediately. He sent him to a UPS store. The driver saw the box there and alerted supervisors who opened it for UPS “safety” and it was full of cash and going to Yuma, AZ. It was ultimately delivered. UPS was on the lookout. A couple of days later a package was coming back to defendant in Iowa from Yuma. It was separated for a few hours for a dog sniff which led to a search warrant for anticipatory delivery because the box contained drugs. UPS was not a government actor, and the brief detention of the package was reasonable. United States v. Gonzalez, 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 4703 (8th Cir. March 23, 2015).*

This entry was posted in Border search, Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Private search. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.