E.D.N.Y.: CSLI collection was shown to be with cause; def likely didn’t even have standing

Defendant used the cell phone of another in this alleged criminal enterprise, and it is doubtful that he has standing to complain of the cell site location information collection. Even if he did have standing, it was all obtained by court order with sufficient cause shown, and, besides, the good faith exception would apply. The Stored Communications Act is still constitutional in this circuit, and elsewhere, so it applies and was complied with. United States v. Ashburn, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178424 (E.D. N.Y. December 30, 2014).

“The defendant Arthur Jeter seeks to suppress evidence, specifically a handgun, retrieved from the back seat floor of a car in which he was a front seat passenger on October 23, 2013. (Tr. 9/12/14, M-12.) Through counsel Mr. Jeter raises troubling issues concerning the handling of a confidential informant (‘CI’), the apparent failure of the city police to disclose the existence of that CI to the city prosecutor, and the reliability of the lead detective’s recollection. Ultimately, however, these issues do not dispel the existence of reasonable suspicion at the time the officers approached the car with a display of force that amounted to a seizure. From that initial investigative detention a rapid evolution of events led to probable cause to arrest when Sgt. Edward Davis saw Mr. Jeter toss into the back of the car a black sweatshirt from which a gun fell onto the floor, where, now in plain view, it was seen and retrieved by Det. David Kincaid. (M-21-25, 170-73.) Accordingly, Mr. Jeter’s motion to suppress the gun will be denied.” United States v. Jeter, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 178441 (D. Md. December 30, 2014).*

This entry was posted in Good faith exception, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.